Search for: All records

Synopsis The trajectory of evolution is impacted by molecular constraints and biases that are difficult to validate experimentally. Repeated evolution of similar traits across the Tree of Life serves as a natural experiment to discern common factors that drive the evolution of these traits. The architecture of genomes in one-dimensional, two-dimensional, and three-dimensional space is emerging as a potential factor that may predict repeated phenotypic evolution. For example, chromatin packaging and the 3D organization of the genome within the nucleus can impose evolutionary constraints by predisposing genomic regions for particular types of mutations, while the evolution of genome sequence can also drive reorganization of chromatin. With the explosion of new library preparation and sequencing technologies that are accessible for non-model species, we envision a great opportunity to understand how genome architecture across phylogenetically disparate species may impact repeated phenotypic evolution. We provide examples of the known and potential avenues of phenotypic convergence at each level of genome architecture and how integration of these data can provide unique insights into the constraints, trajectory, and predictability of evolution. 

Abstract Engineered living materials (ELMs) are an emerging class of biohybrid materials with genetically programmable functionalities. Integrating ELMs with 3D bioprinting synergizes their biological programmability with the geometry‐driven functionality of 3D‐printed constructs, transforming these materials into practical products and engineering solutions. This integration also introduces a new paradigm in additive manufacturing that harnesses the “livingness” of encapsulated microorganisms as an active element in the fabrication process to create adaptive and evolving 3D constructs. This Perspective presents recent advances in 3D bioprinting and discusses current developments at the intersection of 3D bioprinting and ELMs. It highlights opportunities at the interface of these two emerging fields, including understanding the interactions between living and nonliving components of ELMs for bioink design, incorporating synthetic biology into bioprinting workflows, utilizing microbial growth as a postprinting fabrication process, and integrating shape‐morphing materials to enable the 4D printing of ELMs.